Jedit mtg art5/10/2023 Obviously, conceding shouldn't be done yelling and tableflipping. I don't claim to have objectively correct answers to these questions, but I think they add some needed nuance to the central question of when someone can concede to another person's detriment. Is Barktooth free to gracefully and respectfully concede, forcing Jedit to attack the remaining available player? During Jedit's first main phase, before Jedit attacks, Barktooth Warbeard gets a critical removal spell countered and decides this game is unwinnable. Is it fair play to concede a game if it forces another player into a line of action? Marisi, Breaker of the Coil Combat Control goads Jedit Ojanen into attacking. Is it fair play to concede if a player can reasonably expect to be unable to proceed, if an opponent is relying on their presence? If Sen Triplets Stax has stripped all artifact removal from The Lady of the Mountain's deck through Sadistic Sacrament and has taken control of nearly all of The Lady's permanents, can The Lady concede on the grounds that she reasonably believes she can't win, even though it would cost Triplets some key blockers? barely hanging on at 4 life and built up a Fervored board this turn? Is it fair play to concede in response to being attacked? If Gahiji, Honored One Beatdown attacks Tobias Andrion with a Titanic Ultimatum and enough creatures to defeat Tobias, can Tobias concede immediately to avoid the lifelink damage? Does the answer change whether Gahiji is dominating the match at 300 life + board vs. The issue is "when is quitting the game right to do?" Instead of directly answering, I'd like to add some supplemental questions, based on this thread and my own thoughts. That player loses the game."īut the legality of concession isn't really the issue here. A player who concedes leaves the game immediately. And 104.3a very much says a player can dip out of it all: "A player can concede the game at any time. Refusing to vote on Expropriate, then continuing to play, is disrespectful and illegal. Conceding with a tantrum is disrespectful, but legal. However, I see the following: conceding gracefully is respectful and legal. Good game, and well played," would that still be an issue? I understand that the game flow can be radically changed by who's present and available. If, hypothetically, the other player said "I'm afraid I have no chance at winning, I concede. But I take special exception to the tantrum. "he only other valid player threw a tantrum & left the game" is not good play. Gleeock I haven't gotten in a multiplayer game with randoms for years now, I've never played cEDH, and I don't actually have a regular group at the moment (frustration and sadness), so I'm probably out of touch with actual multiplayer reality.Īll the same, though, I have a couple of responses. New Social Contract Breach Discussion 5 months ago
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |